By Brad Dison
Most fathers would do just about anything to protect their daughters from harm, criticism, and unhappiness. Margaret’s father was no different. In December 1950, Margaret, a soprano singer, performed at the famous Ryman Auditorium in Nashville, Tennessee to crowds who were enthusiastic about her “winning manner, discriminating selection of music, and naturalness.” She had had many successes in concert and solo roles with several orchestras. On this particular night, Margaret was accompanied by Herman Allison on piano. When the curtain rose, Margaret greeted the large, cheering crowd wearing a concert dress of sari material, billowy material woven of gold and silver threads, which had been a gift from the wife of the Prime Minister of Pakistan.” One critic reported that she won over the audience “before she sang a note.” During her performance, she sang such difficult selections as “The Nightingale” by Schubert, “The Nut Tree,” by Schumann, and an aria from “Le Nozze de Figaro.” So enthused was the audience that night that Margaret performed two encores.
While many other critics wrote positive reviews, 34-year-old Paul Hume, music editor for The Washington Post, was less than impressed. Hume wrote that Margaret “cannot sing very well” and “is flat a good deal of the time.” “There are a few moments during her recital,” he wrote, “when one can relax and feel confident that she will maker her goal, which is the end of the song… It is an extremely unpleasant duty to record such unhappy facts about so honestly appealing a personality. But as long as [Margaret] sings as she has for three years, and does today, we seem to have no recourse unless it is to omit comment on her programs altogether.” It was a biting review.
In response, Margaret said that she had not had time to read the review but he, Paul Hume, “has a perfect right to say whatever he thinks.” She had received other negative reviews from critics in the past, but concert hall, radio, and television audiences adored her. Despite the critics, people flocked to see her perform. Margaret brushed off the negative review. Margaret’s father, however, was enraged by Hume’s review. He wrote a scathing letter to Hume in which he said, “I have just read your lousy review buried in the back pages. You sound like a frustrated old man who never made a success, an eight-ulcer man on a four-ulcer job, and all four ulcers working.” Margaret’s father’s anger grew as he continued to write. “I never met you but if I do, you’ll need a new nose and plenty of beefsteak and perhaps a supporter below.” In the letter, Margaret’s father threatened to “beat [him] up, from top to bottom.” On the following day, newspapers reprinted parts of Margaret’s father’s letter. At first, Margaret was surprised and did not believe her father wrote the scathing letter. When she learned that her father had written the letter, she told the press that she had “no comment to make.” Margaret’s father explained that he had written the letter out of love for his daughter.
On March 27, 2002, more than five decades later, Margaret’s father’s letter to Paul Hume was auctioned by the world-famous Christie’s Auction House. The letter sold for $193,000. You see, Margaret’s father wrote the letter on White House stationery. Margaret’s father was President Harry Truman.
Sources:
1. “Truman, Harry. Autograph letter signed (H.S.T.” to Paul Hume, Music Critic of the Washington Post, D.C., 6 December 1950,” Christies.com, https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-3886900.
2. The Tennessean (Nashville, Tennessee), December 9, 1950, p.1.
3. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, December 24, 1950, p.13.
